Two words, two completely different products

The phrase “private golf membership” covers a wide range of legal arrangements. At one end, you are a part-owner of the club and its real estate — a voting stakeholder with a claim on assets if the club ever dissolves. At the other, you hold a revocable license to use a facility owned entirely by a third party. Both are sold as “memberships.” Neither is inherently better. But they are not the same thing, and the document you sign determines which one you are buying.

An equity membership gives members a collective ownership stake in the club’s assets. A non-equity membership, as one club disclosure puts it plainly, is “merely a right to use; it is not ownership.” That distinction carries downstream consequences for your voting rights, your exit options, your tax treatment, and your exposure if the club encounters financial stress. Understanding the structure before you sign is not due diligence — it is the minimum.

What equity membership actually means legally

At a member-owned club, the membership interest functions similarly to stock in a corporation that holds the underlying real estate. Members elect the board, vote on capital projects, approve bylaw changes, and in some structures receive a formal certificate that can appreciate or depreciate in value as club fortunes shift. Under applicable property law, a membership interest in a mutual-benefit corporation constitutes an ownership interest in a legal entity — though no individual member can sell the real estate outright.

The practical consequence of ownership appears most clearly on dissolution. When an equity club winds down after paying creditors, remaining assets are distributed to members in proportion to their capital contributions. That provision is typically written into the club’s bylaws or articles of incorporation. It is also the provision that gets litigated most aggressively when clubs fall into financial distress, because the gap between what members are owed and what actually exists can be enormous.

Voting rights are the other material difference. Equity members govern the club’s direction: they approve capital assessments, can remove board members, and must typically ratify any change to initiation fee refund structures. Non-equity members have no such standing — the operator sets dues, determines capital spending, and can change terms unilaterally within whatever agreement the member signed.

Non-equity operators: the owner-operator model

The majority of private golf clubs in the United States — by most industry estimates, close to 85% — operate on a non-equity model. A corporation owns the real estate and infrastructure; members pay initiation fees and monthly dues for access. The operator’s incentives are not aligned with individual member investment — they are aligned with property appreciation, operating margin, and portfolio management.

The three largest operators illustrate the range of approaches. Invited (formerly ClubCorp) owns roughly 170 clubs across 28 states and serves more than 430,000 members, making it the largest private-club operator in the country. Its model is straightforward: tiered initiation fees, predictable monthly dues, and reciprocal access across the network. Arcis Golf operates more than 60 championship clubs and is the second-largest operator by course count, with a portfolio that ranges from semi-private facilities up to high-initiation private clubs. Concert Golf Partners takes a boutique approach — acquiring equity clubs, resolving their existing refund liabilities upfront with an all-cash purchase, then converting members to a non-equity structure with dues frozen for a set period. In a Concert conversion, the capital that would have been refunded to resigned members instead flows into club improvements. Existing members sign new documents and retain their playing privileges; what they lose is the ownership stake.

None of this is inherently predatory — operator-owned clubs often maintain better capital reserves and more consistent service standards than a volunteer board ever managed. But you are a customer, not an owner, and your rights under the agreement reflect that.

The refund-queue problem at equity clubs

Refundable deposits are among the most misunderstood financial instruments in private club membership. The term “refundable” is accurate — eventually. The mechanics of when and how refunds occur vary widely, and there is no industry standard.

The most common structure ties refunds to new membership sales: one departed member advances in the queue for every two, three, or four new members who join. When the club is healthy and demand is strong, the queue moves. When it is not, it stalls. The Trump National Doral case became a widely-reported example of queue failure: as of late 2018, the refund formula required four new members to join for each departing member to advance one position, and the club had enrolled only eight new members over the prior year. Members who had resigned faced projected waits measured in decades.

The legal position of resigned members waiting on refunds is weaker than most of them realize. If a club files for bankruptcy protection, holders of refundable deposits are typically classified as unsecured creditors — behind secured lenders, tax authorities, and trade creditors. Recovery at pennies on the dollar is common. Some clubs have used bankruptcy specifically to extinguish refund liabilities. Before treating a refundable deposit as a meaningful financial asset, ask the club directly: how many members are currently in the refund queue, what is the average wait time over the past five years, and what happens to the queue if the club is sold or converted.

Transferability and the resale market

Equity memberships at clubs with active resale markets can be sold to third parties, subject to club approval. The selling member may realize a gain if the club’s desirability has increased since they joined, or a loss if demand has softened. Transfer fees — typically assessed by the club as a percentage of the transaction price — reduce net proceeds; sellers should confirm the transfer fee structure before listing.

The resale market for private golf memberships has tightened considerably since 2020. Waitlists, which affected roughly 25% of private clubs before the pandemic, now affect close to 50% — and at clubs with initiation fees above $90,000, more than 70% report either a waitlist or excess demand. In that environment, sellers of equity memberships at sought-after clubs hold negotiating leverage they would not have had five years ago. At clubs with weaker demand, the resale market can be thin or nonexistent.

Non-equity memberships are generally not transferable in the same way — the operator controls new membership sales, and there is no ownership stake to transfer. Some non-equity clubs allow members to assign their membership to a family member or business partner, but this is a contractual accommodation, not a property right.

Reading the agreement: the clauses that matter

Most membership agreements are long enough to discourage careful reading. Four provisions deserve specific attention regardless of which model you are considering.

Capital assessments. Both equity and non-equity clubs reserve the right to levy special assessments for capital improvements. At equity clubs, member approval is typically required above a threshold; at non-equity clubs, the operator may assess at will within whatever limit the agreement specifies. Understand the cap, the approval process, and the history of assessments before signing.

Bylaw amendment procedures. At equity clubs, the standard for amending bylaws — particularly provisions governing refund structures — is the most litigation-prone section of the entire document. A Florida court granted class-action status in 2021 to hundreds of resigned members at a Concert Golf-acquired club after finding that existing bylaws required unanimous member consent before any refund changes could take effect. Verify what percentage vote triggers a valid amendment and whether you are protected by supermajority requirements.

Resignation and forfeiture language. Many agreements state explicitly that upon resignation, a member forfeits all dues and fees paid and remains liable for any financed portion of the initiation fee. Understand the conditions under which you can resign, what you are owed, and what you still owe.

Dissolution clause. This provision specifies what happens to club assets if the entity winds down. At equity clubs, remaining assets after debt repayment are distributed to members proportionally. Confirm the clause exists and is enforceable — it is the legal foundation of the ownership stake you are paying for.

Tax and financial considerations

Equity golf memberships are treated as capital assets for federal income tax purposes. A sale above your original purchase price plus any capital assessments you paid into the club generates a taxable capital gain, reported on Form 8949. The counterintuitive asymmetry: if you sell at a loss, that loss is generally not deductible, because the IRS treats a personal-use membership as personal-use property rather than an investment. Members who paid $165,000 and sold for $100,000 have recovered $100,000 — not $100,000 plus a tax deduction.

Membership dues at golf and country clubs are categorically non-deductible under IRC §274, a prohibition added by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 and unchanged since. Qualifying business meals at the club may retain a partial deduction under current rules, but the membership itself does not. Anyone structuring a membership purchase around tax efficiency should verify their specific facts with a qualified tax advisor before signing.

Which model fits which member

Equity membership is the right structure for a buyer who intends to use a single club as a long-term home, wants governance participation, and can tolerate illiquidity in exchange for a potential ownership upside. It requires genuine comfort with the club’s financial position, the depth of its refund queue, and the competence of its elected board — because that board makes the decisions that affect your investment.

Non-equity membership suits buyers who value flexibility, multi-club access, and professional facility management over ownership. Operator-owned clubs tend to maintain tighter capital reserves and more predictable physical standards, and the absence of a refund queue removes one category of financial risk entirely. The tradeoff is that you have no seat at the table if the operator changes terms, sells the property, or reconfigures the membership structure.

A third option — network membership — exists outside both frameworks. Access-based models provide reciprocal playing privileges at multiple clubs without the capital commitment of equity ownership or the long-term tie of a single-club non-equity agreement. For members whose golf travel spans multiple markets or whose primary need is flexibility rather than a home-club identity, the network model removes the ownership question entirely.

Keep reading

One network, dozens of destinations. LXV delivers playing access across elite private clubs without requiring an equity stake or a single-club commitment — alongside reciprocal access to the world’s most exclusive private clubs. Apply for membership →